This really is taking breeding to a whole new level.
I think of breeding consistent dogs as more of an "art" or a "knack" ... but with some tangible reasoning and breeding patterns behind it ... and this is basically science backing up the art so it's great that you're sharing these things here, thanks.
Jack
Amazing results
The good thing about science is that it prevents loss of time. If it wasn't for the DNA test, I'd have bred supermachobuck to miss Machobuck to preserve the blood, and I'd be wasting time. The correct breeding is MR.Machobuck to MachabearOriginally Posted by CA Jack
That is a great point.
So what does the DNA says about gameness and ability.
Evo that why I ------ with u you always doing something to make something better I like that my boy
Well sir, I'm assuming that's what Machobucks DNA is bringing to the table
Can you give me your opinions on this set of DNA alleles.
Your example is a perfect example of how the genes can be passed
On to almost having a clone of the sire. But what happens when the match
Is only on the first allele of a pair in particular the dominant one?
cd ff ab de dd fg cd bb ff ab
cc ef aa ee dd ff bb bb dg bb
So you see 5 dominant alleles match and 3 recessive alleles match while 2 are a identical match.
Just trying to make sense of this now as I feel its a very useful tool in breeding, thanks.
Dogs are very closely related..... but top dog is not sire of bottom dog.... close though
Thank you for sharing this info !
This is why I try to push anyone serious about there dogs to this forum
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote