Originally Posted by
S_B
dpitbull,
With over 2,000 members subscribed to this site I hardly think 70 comments is to many pages of arguing, as you call it. Especially if there are members who didn't get it on page #1 and who will likely not get it if the debate made it to page #100.
We all have opinions you're entitled to yours as well as I am entitled to mine. I feel stating the same thing over and over is a waste of time. Even Jack said that he was done trying to reach Eneas.
And just in case you are unaware, the moderators are the only ones who make the decision to close a thread.
I don't mean close a thread literally. Obviously I am not a moderator so I can't close a thread. I was reiterating to Eneas he had made his point.
I think Jack has brought up many good points as to why changes are necessary to be not only successful in your plight, but to protect the work you have painstakingly put together.
I agree he has made his point about piracy. I clearly stated that
Yes, you get what you pay for, and if you are spending your hard earned dollar to the SDJ, and several knuckleheads are bootlegging it for 1/3 of the cost that should bother you as well.
I agree with this as well. I definitely don't want to pay for something that is being given out for free.
You would think any normal rational person would get that?
Again I don't see where I have argued against the points Jack or anyone else has made. So to state again I don't disagree with anyone on this threads ideas. So not sure I see the reasoning behind dissecting my post. You make it seem as if I had argued against Jack's responses to Eneas. I have not I made it abundantly clear I agree that piracy is wrong. I also made it clear that I think that the sdj has the right to change it's policies at any time.
S_B
Reply With Quote