Good post.
Another thing to keep in mind, if the dogs are really good, is NOT to stop at the first generation ... because you may need "one more" breeding step to solidify the percentages
Some dogs aren't very good producers ... as sires ... but they are as grandsires/granddams
In other words, the first generation may not be the dogs you hope, but taking another breeding step (to isolate the genes) might be required.
For example, Ch Hammer was considered NOT to be a very good producer ... yet he was a living DG dog and was out of an all-game litter. Many people told me "not" to breed to Hammer, because he "couldn't produce," but I ignored their bad advise and bred to him with Miss Trinx, who was also out of an all-game litter. The result? I got an all-game litter of absolutely prepotent producers
Moreover, on my double-, triple-, and quadruple-bred Hammer dogs, I continuously enjoyed high-percentages ... even though Ch Hammer was not thought of as a "good producer."
The truth is, (2) Ch Hammer's real pedigree wasn't known, (2) most people did not breed Ch Hammer to the same-quality bitch as I did, and (3) most of the idiots who had Hammer pups were rolling the shit out of them at an early age.
By ignoring the "advice" of UNsuccessful idiots, and by realizing that Ch Hammer was as close to DG as a live dog could be, came from an all-game litter, and by breeding him TO a truly quality bitch, I was able to create the cornerstone of my own bloodline, using my own ideas, and I produced more winners and quality dogs than ANYone who poo-pooed the idea of my breeding to Hammer.
I was confident that Hammer could produce, if bred to the right bitch, and if the pups were done right.
So, again, let your own gut, knowledge, and beliefs be your guide ... never "anyone else's" ...
Jack