?
I've seen it posted all over Facebook
i saw it too and found out its legit and being backed by REPUTABLE KNL/FIRST CLASS DOGMAN .I VOUCH FOR IT AND ADVISE OTHERS TO CHECK IT OUT!!!!
Personaly I think the days of reporting shows to magazines has long passed. IMHO you would have to be a serious retard to furnish a magazine with evidence that can be used against you and will probably end up on ebay in a few years, avalible to the highest bidder.
There's no need to report any shows but I think a magazine is a good thing just for entertainment purposes ans for people to sell some products like back in the day treadmills hides videos and well bred hounds
ERIK440 FROM WHAT I HEARD THATS EXACTLY WHAT THEIR MAGAZINE IS STRIVING TO DO AND ALSO I HEAR THE EDITOR(S) ARE FIRST CLASS DOGMAN THAT WANT TO TARGET ALL AREAS OF THE MARKET...PRODUCTS,EQUIPMENT,PICTURES,STORIES,STUDS ,SUPPLEMENTS/SUPPLIES,ENTERTAINMENT ETC...JUST FOR DOGMAN/KENNELS TO HAVE A PLACE TO CONGREGATE.IF IT CATCHES ON IS ANOTHER QUESTION????BUT I AM GONNA SUPPORT THEIR MOVEMENT.SHOW REPORTS ARE ANOTHER ISSUE AS LONG AS THEIR HISTORICALLY BASED AND/OR KEPT UNDER THE RADAR.JMHO
Yeah I was never OK with the old sdj reporting matches attracts too much heat not with all this media BS
This is not a dig at you or the editors of the mag, they are free to print whatever they want and I wish them well, anyone who gets off their arse and tries to create or improve on something gains my respect for doing so.Originally Posted by skootermc
You say they want to target dogmen and that the mag is aimed at all aspects of the dog game and that some things should be kept under the radar. The thing I don’t understand (I may be out of touch here) why have a website that ANYONE can go on and download a sample of the mag and why put it all over face book. The best dogmen I know don’t even go on the internet.
The very front cover refers to 1xW and ROM do folk not realize that the antis are not as stupid as you would want them to be! Page 2 has a ped with references to W, L and ROM ... and page 3 has an article titled Breeding The Match Dog .. I’m sure you see my point and I won’t go on.
Again this is only my opinion - I think that by putting these sorts of mags out and advertising in them people are making themselves targets for the tree huggers. I hope I’m wrong, but having known some good folk on the receiving end, having had all their dogs murdered, their family harassed by antis and having to watch them spend a fortune to keep themselves out of prison but get themselves in debt, it is not a situation I would wish on anyone.
The antis are good at gathering information, and we make it so much easier for them. They employ people that trawl all the internet sites gathering info and obviously have subs to pedigree websites and at least all the freely available magazines (and probably some that aren’t so freely available!). Some sites are so open at what they post it makes me cringe with embarrassment. Isn't it time we wised up, stop squabbling amoungst ourselves, stop giving out info so freely and worked more towards helping each other out and preserving (and hopefully improving) what we all love.
It just seems to me that sometimes we can be our own worst enemies.
I know humaniacs can get a lot of "general information" off the internet, but no one who's ever been convicted has been had over internet posts. It is only secondary evidence.
The truth is, what you get caught DOING, what you get caught WITH, what you say IN PERSON, and what you say ON THE PHONE will always carry the bulk of the weight on any case being made against you.
That is simply a fact, and 99% of the "internet paranoia" is just that: paranoia.
The worst thing you can do is start rolling dogs with some unk joker you met off the internet ... ambiguosly discussing dogs or posting peds has never hurt anyone.
Jack
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote