Page 12 of 18 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 173

Thread: DISPUTED OR FAKE PEDS FROM THE PAST AND PRESENT .

  1. #111
    Quote Originally Posted by bolero View Post
    how about your dates are wrong mayb floyd was mistaken or mayb earl lied ever think of that mayb earl bred dibo as a puppy and had billy for a while before he gave him to floyd
    Bolero how about this maybe floyd lied how about that scenario or shall we just try to make the dobs and floyds own words count for nothing, there has never been any question to the dobs of dibo or floyd ever saying anything apart from the same thing hes always said that billy was born in 1952 , but if you want to play lets pretend and what if aliens took dibo bred him then put him on ealrs yard bla bla bla, then yes anythings possible , but why when we have a clean and clear timeline you dont want to accept it ? .

  2. #112
    Let It Go Please !!!!

  3. #113
    Quote Originally Posted by Foxman View Post
    Jack, I liked Mayfield and visited with him many times. He was a very interesting person til around the last four or five years of his life. He would write paragraph after parigraph of material that I had no understanding of what he was trying to say sort of like projectX. Clements called it the Ramblings of Mayfield. I ask Boudreaux years ago. Boudreaux may not remember this about what he thought about Mayfield and some of the things he said. He'd grin and say Mayfield is mayfield. I never did worship Mayfield like he was a God liike some of the dogmen do. Matter of fact I do not believe there are any dogmen without some faults expecially myself. Mayfield was a talented dogman with many faults just like everyone else. Weldon stockton who is a long time trusted friend of mine and also was a good friend of Mayfields. I talk to him on the internet three or four times a week. He read a statement Mayfield wrote that he only fought dogs that belong to himself. Weldon said that is a damn lie. Weldon said Mayfield borrowed several dogs from me and matched them. Of course all dogmen back then knew that. His outstanding ability was in his conditioning only. I see lots of people better than him in other areas. I do not think he was a better conditioner than Floyd. Mayfield was a Bell boy at a Hotel and Floyd told me he put tile in bathrooms and did lots of other professsional stuff. I told him I was a Commercial Plumbing Contractor and he said he also Plumbed. So I put him up quiet a bit above Mayfield in his work and money making abilities. Mayfield as he got older quit the bell boy job and rasied a big commercial vegetable garden and did good at that. He had lots of customers. Like I said he was a good dogman but not a God to be worshipped.
    Well (and fairly) said.

    Jack

  4. #114
    Quote Originally Posted by CA Jack View Post
    We simply disagree. People being "happy" with a man's dogs means nothing. Hell, there are millions of people who are "happy" with pomeranians.

    What we're talking about is producing seriously good dogs that truly affect the game. And while Mayfield may have bred some good dogs, his influence was negligible when compared to his peers about whom he speaks (Carver, Tudor, Boudreaux). Mayfield's influence as a breeder was nowhere near these individuals'.

    Does that make him wrong? Not necessarily. I am sure there is merit in some of what he says, but I sure wouldn't be hanging on his every word like you seem to.

    Jack
    Jack im surprised that you dont know more about the dogs mayfield dealt to some top dogmen around the usa, but thats fine, but like i said from the south to cannada and if you look inside texas thers more than enough men who kept his line
    and were happy to ahve it, as it was the purest of the dibo blood ,and the men who got it knew what they were getting
    in dons days.
    OK if i was hanging onto every word of dons i would have to hang onto all of them which i dont, as otherwise i would not hesitate to say that there is no doubt that tombstone is out of baby, but i dont as i agree their is every chance it could be
    gina, but after weighing up the evidence to hand my gut feeling like yours jack was baby but it could be gina, and you jack
    agreed with don that you did feel it was baby so are you not also agreeing as you say i am as it was from my first
    post on this thread about tombstone and dons story and audios that you thought that it made sense , so you also are in agreement with mayfield based on the same things i had to work with ,namely the evidence or gut feeling based on the hearsay back story and audio tapes along with a knolwedge of the breeding that did and didnt make sense to do.

    On blind billy jack i am in no doubt, and if you and others want to play the (lets make up all the possible scenarios that
    might lead to dibo having been bred before earl got him so it makes dibo billys sire)then lets say the same thing about every
    breeding ever made before dna was around so we might aswell tear up all the peds from before 1980 and start again.Or we
    could do what makes sense, and that is use the brain we have the overall evidence both hearsay (the fact that floyd never
    had black dogs before eli came along /other dogmen had seen crybaby nursing the pups/even offered a pup which would have been eli etcetc) then add the dobs in which for more than 50 years in both dbios and billys case no one untill this thread
    has ever claimed may be wrong or mistaken and no story of dibo ever being bred before getting to earls yard and even floyds own words as to what year billy was born has never changed , but we want to help floyd by saying maybe he got the dob wrong or maybe dibos dob is wrong , but i can tell you this , and i may myself be wrong but its something i had forgotten and its this, if i buy a dog from you i know i bought it from you so that shouldnt change should it , so why would floyd have told two versions of how he got billy , he has said for sure that he traded earl 3 roosters for billy and then im sure ive seen and definetly heard that floyd also said he got billy from his uncle , but im sure someone will correct me if im wrong, but what im saying is, lets not try to alter what we know at least to be true which is dibos story without trying to add all these scenarios to make it look like dibo is billys sire, then i would say ok make the case ,but it has to be believable the pieces have to fit, not just saying ,well a one year old dog could sire a litter ,or what if heinzl bred him etc etc
    without making the pieces fit, all they really are are unrealistic what if scenarios .

    To make all or any of the scenarios mentioned in this thread and many others fit better than the actually evidence we already have, it would make the whole thing so over conveluted complex and intricate to such a riddiculous extent
    ,that it would be easier to find out exactly who killed president kennedy and actually prosecute them than make
    the what if dibo scenarios stand up to serious scrutiny, unless of course we decide we want to live in the caos
    that is the world of what if scenarios and overlook the obvious, then i agreree anything is possible.

  5. #115
    Quote Originally Posted by projectx View Post
    Jack im surprised that you dont know more about the dogs mayfield dealt to some top dogmen around the usa, but thats fine, but like i said from the south to cannada and if you look inside texas thers more than enough men who kept his line
    and were happy to ahve it, as it was the purest of the dibo blood ,and the men who got it knew what they were getting
    in dons days.
    OK if i was hanging onto every word of dons i would have to hang onto all of them which i dont, as otherwise i would not hesitate to say that there is no doubt that tombstone is out of baby, but i dont as i agree their is every chance it could be
    gina, but after weighing up the evidence to hand my gut feeling like yours jack was baby but it could be gina, and you jack
    agreed with don that you did feel it was baby so are you not also agreeing as you say i am as it was from my first
    post on this thread about tombstone and dons story and audios that you thought that it made sense , so you also are in agreement with mayfield based on the same things i had to work with ,namely the evidence or gut feeling based on the hearsay back story and audio tapes along with a knolwedge of the breeding that did and didnt make sense to do.

    On blind billy jack i am in no doubt, and if you and others want to play the (lets make up all the possible scenarios that
    might lead to dibo having been bred before earl got him so it makes dibo billys sire)then lets say the same thing about every
    breeding ever made before dna was around so we might aswell tear up all the peds from before 1980 and start again.Or we
    could do what makes sense, and that is use the brain we have the overall evidence both hearsay (the fact that floyd never
    had black dogs before eli came along /other dogmen had seen crybaby nursing the pups/even offered a pup which would have been eli etcetc) then add the dobs in which for more than 50 years in both dbios and billys case no one untill this thread
    has ever claimed may be wrong or mistaken and no story of dibo ever being bred before getting to earls yard and even floyds own words as to what year billy was born has never changed , but we want to help floyd by saying maybe he got the dob wrong or maybe dibos dob is wrong , but i can tell you this , and i may myself be wrong but its something i had forgotten and its this, if i buy a dog from you i know i bought it from you so that shouldnt change should it , so why would floyd have told two versions of how he got billy , he has said for sure that he traded earl 3 roosters for billy and then im sure ive seen and definetly heard that floyd also said he got billy from his uncle , but im sure someone will correct me if im wrong, but what im saying is, lets not try to alter what we know at least to be true which is dibos story without trying to add all these scenarios to make it look like dibo is billys sire, then i would say ok make the case ,but it has to be believable the pieces have to fit, not just saying ,well a one year old dog could sire a litter ,or what if heinzl bred him etc etc
    without making the pieces fit, all they really are are unrealistic what if scenarios .

    To make all or any of the scenarios mentioned in this thread and many others fit better than the actually evidence we already have, it would make the whole thing so over conveluted complex and intricate to such a riddiculous extent
    ,that it would be easier to find out exactly who killed president kennedy and actually prosecute them than make
    the what if dibo scenarios stand up to serious scrutiny, unless of course we decide we want to live in the caos
    that is the world of what if scenarios and overlook the obvious, then i agreree anything is possible.
    The sheep Clarise... Tell me about the sheep.


  6. #116

  7. #117
    Quote Originally Posted by evolutionkennels View Post
    The sheep Clarise... Tell me about the sheep.

    Evo i could care less if you and the rest of the folks on here think im retarded , but first thing is i think that its disgracefull that you find handicapped children funny and would post that foto even if its to poke fun at me, your just like that school yard bully who thinks hes the bees knees , but im sure anyone on here who may have a child like that would find that offensive and you and the others who think its funny should be ashamed of yourselves , i hope you never have one of your own then see how funny it is and maybe the fact that you posted that foto makes you a little more like the person your trying to paint me as evo . But secondly for you
    and the others who might find that funny ,rather than try to make fun of me, why dont you smart alecks try tell me how you get a square peg into the round hole that is floyds story
    and the facts regarding blind billy, this is after all is a thread about dogs with disputed pedigrees , or are you so
    lacking in any ideas that you take the easy and curs way out evo but then i shouldnt be surpirsed about that i suppose coming from a man or men who would find that foto funny regardless of who its designed to riddicule , and what i would find far more eassy to riddicule is a person or persons who are entitled to their views just as i am , but when faced with facts that they cant dsipute with anymore substantial facts themselves to prove otherwise, would deem to riddicule that person rather than show thier own iron clad theory
    that would indeed support that riddicule ,but of ocourse what we get is the bottom of the garbage in a person that can find it funny to post such a foto , maybe its more a true reflection of themselves .

  8. #118
    Quote Originally Posted by projectx View Post
    Jack im surprised that you dont know more about the dogs mayfield dealt to some top dogmen around the usa, but thats fine, but like i said from the south to cannada and if you look inside texas thers more than enough men who kept his line
    Projectx, I realize you are a Mayfield disciple ... and that you probably wear Mayfield t-shirts and say your prayers to Mayfield at night ... but please don't start talking to me as if "you" are now Mayfield ... because it really can't get much more embarrassing for you at this point



    Jack

  9. #119
    Quote Originally Posted by evolutionkennels View Post
    The sheep Clarise... Tell me about the sheep.
    LMAO, it really has gotten to this point ...

  10. #120
    Subscribed Member BKNGAME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    north carolina
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by evolutionkennels View Post
    The sheep Clarise... Tell me about the sheep.

    All this Bk & forth abt dead and gone dogmen when there are 21st Century breeders & dogmen who are altering peds or explaining to u (after purchase) why your peds aren't the same as what's posted on their sites!!! They'll even pretend tht you're the idiot because u didn't know tht "XYZ" didn't hv papers on him in 1983. I had lost over 30+ dogs due to motorcycle accident in 2006 which left me in a wheelchair for over 14 months then rehab, life, etc took another few years before I ws once again able to own this magnificent, highly controversial breed. Since then I've spent a small fortune putting together another yard with completely different strains than before. I researched journals as to who ws doing what and made my decisions on only to find out tht these new acquaintances think completely different. A great friend of mine told me that a good bulldog is where u find him. Firstly know tht u can trust the breeder---registry refused to correct papers on dog due to handwritten peds from Hollingsworth himself tht he obtained personally. 2nd thing I've noticed is that these pit forum site glorify the moderators or creators of site. If u search the respected Vise-Grip kennels on Game-Dog.com there's comments tht Jack's dogs are only good for house pets!! I found this post researching the bulldogs involved in my purchases. I personally hv spent my hard earned money on 2 dogs that contain Jack's breeding (an older dbl "PONCHO" gyp & dam of male pup) & I completely disagree with tht thought until shown differently. These Internet sites do assist in finding certain strains, but if their peds are real or not is a question not only posed from the old schoolers but current bulldog inventory as well. I'm still waiting on papers for 2dogs from a well known breeder who previously had my papers in hand on prior dealings.... will these 2peds be fake?! Best advice any man can hv is keep your own records true & put the dogs 1st. Times hv definitely changed & people are less trustworthy everyday due to economic factors, yard space, & life in general. So beating up on Mayfield, Tudor, Maloney, Patrick should serve as an insight vs a debate ovr which crook u trust the most. THERE ARE NO TRUE PEDIGREES....
    I used CA Jack as an example of how people will say anything & I purposely DID NOT mention 21st century breeders/dogmen as to not discredit the work they've done after the illegitimacy of certain dogs in current pedigrees. I only hope to hv the same or better success in retrospect to the Hounds I lost in 2006.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •