Originally Posted by
projectx
Jack im surprised that you dont know more about the dogs mayfield dealt to some top dogmen around the usa, but thats fine, but like i said from the south to cannada and if you look inside texas thers more than enough men who kept his line
and were happy to ahve it, as it was the purest of the dibo blood ,and the men who got it knew what they were getting
in dons days.
OK if i was hanging onto every word of dons i would have to hang onto all of them which i dont, as otherwise i would not hesitate to say that there is no doubt that tombstone is out of baby, but i dont as i agree their is every chance it could be
gina, but after weighing up the evidence to hand my gut feeling like yours jack was baby but it could be gina, and you jack
agreed with don that you did feel it was baby so are you not also agreeing as you say i am as it was from my first
post on this thread about tombstone and dons story and audios that you thought that it made sense , so you also are in agreement with mayfield based on the same things i had to work with ,namely the evidence or gut feeling based on the hearsay back story and audio tapes along with a knolwedge of the breeding that did and didnt make sense to do.
On blind billy jack i am in no doubt, and if you and others want to play the (lets make up all the possible scenarios that
might lead to dibo having been bred before earl got him so it makes dibo billys sire)then lets say the same thing about every
breeding ever made before dna was around so we might aswell tear up all the peds from before 1980 and start again.Or we
could do what makes sense, and that is use the brain we have the overall evidence both hearsay (the fact that floyd never
had black dogs before eli came along /other dogmen had seen crybaby nursing the pups/even offered a pup which would have been eli etcetc) then add the dobs in which for more than 50 years in both dbios and billys case no one untill this thread
has ever claimed may be wrong or mistaken and no story of dibo ever being bred before getting to earls yard and even floyds own words as to what year billy was born has never changed , but we want to help floyd by saying maybe he got the dob wrong or maybe dibos dob is wrong , but i can tell you this , and i may myself be wrong but its something i had forgotten and its this, if i buy a dog from you i know i bought it from you so that shouldnt change should it , so why would floyd have told two versions of how he got billy , he has said for sure that he traded earl 3 roosters for billy and then im sure ive seen and definetly heard that floyd also said he got billy from his uncle , but im sure someone will correct me if im wrong, but what im saying is, lets not try to alter what we know at least to be true which is dibos story without trying to add all these scenarios to make it look like dibo is billys sire, then i would say ok make the case ,but it has to be believable the pieces have to fit, not just saying ,well a one year old dog could sire a litter ,or what if heinzl bred him etc etc
without making the pieces fit, all they really are are unrealistic what if scenarios .
To make all or any of the scenarios mentioned in this thread and many others fit better than the actually evidence we already have, it would make the whole thing so over conveluted complex and intricate to such a riddiculous extent
,that it would be easier to find out exactly who killed president kennedy and actually prosecute them than make
the what if dibo scenarios stand up to serious scrutiny, unless of course we decide we want to live in the caos
that is the world of what if scenarios and overlook the obvious, then i agreree anything is possible.