Thank you ... I believe it is on this website: The Art of Breeding DogsOriginally Posted by Nut
Cheers,
Jack
Thank you ... I believe it is on this website: The Art of Breeding Dogs
Cheers,
Jack
Good post Jack.
Another good article by Indian Sonny. I personally think it is one of the best of all time. Think i posted it in the right place.
http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...3802#post23802
Oops. Well, thats all someone has to read. But then we wouldn't have any more threads to open.
Thank you.
And, yes, I have read that article and think it's a pretty good little piece. While not really getting into methods, or pulling up the hood to get into details, in principle (spirit) it is 100% right on.
Cheers.
LOL, well, you'd be surprised good sir.
You can put the best information possible out there for people ... and 60% of them are too lazy to read it
Of the remaining 40% who do read it, 30% won't understand (or follow) it
Which goes back to the 10% who actually do take the time to read it, who actually have the faculties to understand it, and then really take to heart the principles and follow them in their breeding practices
Which brings us back to another great article, by another great old-timer, "Room at the Top," by Ozzie Stevens ...
Jack
Well said Jack! I'm still in the learning process. Yes, I've read all of your breeding articles and understood very well how you did your breedings. My apology, I guess in this thread I was trying to ask which would be the better breeding beside the "ultimate best breeding"...Which was...to breed two dogs that are off the same blood/parents but only one of them possess the desired traits/style or to breed two dogs that are not related but possess the desire traits/style without any real knowledge of the dogs behind them? I guess the answer is neither one is better than the other? Traits and bloodline are equally important? Again the title of this thread is "Trait vs. Bloodline", so I'm just saying to me, I would rather breed two unrelated dogs with the same traits than two related dogs but only one of them possess the desirable traits. Afterall all bloodlines of canines were created through desirable traits not just because they were from the same family bloodline. The ultimate goal is to have both but that wasn't the question here. Thanks!You understand wrong.
For example, taking some random dog (that is a chest dog) and just breeding it to a relative, who "just happens to be" a head dog is NOT the way to consistently get head dogs.
And breeding her to some relative who is NOT a head dog really isn't the way to get head dogs ...
Now, if you breed her to some strange dog who "is" a head dog (but you know nothing about his background), then all you're doing here is playing guessing-games.
The BEST breeding is TWO dogs that BOTH possess the desired trait of being a head dog, that ARE related by BOTH being down from THE SAME FOUNDATION DOG that likewise had/produces this trait
That, and only that, is how you can enjoy consistent success at getting what you want
The chances are directly proportional to BOTH dogs being consistent representatives of that style/trait ... as opposed to being "flukes" ...
Consistency is everything ... "flukes" are next to nothing ... breeding-wise.
No again. Why are you trying to do EVERYTHING BUT make the best decision?
You and 99% of everyone else who will never make it off the ground as a breeder?
Do you realize there is a reason WHY most people never make it off the ground as breeders???
THEIR CHOICES-SELECTION!
The best decision isn't breeding two unrelated dogs that "happen" to have some trait.
The best decision isn't breeding two related dogs that DON'T have that trait.
The best decision is breeding two RELATED dogs ... that HAVE that trait ... which is an EXPECTED trait from the line ... all linebred on some fabulous dog who HAD/THREW that trait.
No wonder so many people call breeding a "crapshoot" ... or why they think everyone has "zero" chance of knowing what they'll get ... they SET THEMSELVES UP to get a 0% chance
Me? I *knew* was getting fast, slick, athletic, highly-intelligent head dogs in every damned litter I produced, because I set the breeding up to produce them.
It's not rocket science folks; it's basic, ordinary horse sense ... that doesn't seem to be so basic or ordinary with a lot of people.
Well, then, expect to fail. If you set yourself up to fail, then you surely will. Why on earth would you breed to something that you know nothing about, genetically?
That is wasting 2 years of your life feeding a bunch of question-marks.
Have you ever considered the reality that there are more than just "those two dogs" to breed to
I mean, seriously, how can you expect to breed "the best dogs in the world" by playing guessing games and by not insisting on the standards of selection necessary to make sure you produce them?
Me, I didn't make any breedings unless I KNEW I would be producing the best GD dogs on the planet, that would BEAT anything their weight they faced, wherever they got off the plane, or would DIE TRYING ...
No, I didn't get that "every time" ... but I was damned close ... because they did win 87% of the time ... and "won or lost game" 92% of the time ... regardless of where they were in the world ... or whose hands they were in ... and I don't think anyone on earth will top those percentages.
So if you don't have that level of confidence in what you're breeding, and aren't that sure of what you'll be producing, then you shouldn't be making the breeding.
That is my honest opinion, and experience, in breeding dogs for specific traits.
Jack
P.s. I've posted on another thread that I'm still in search of that special dog with that special trait that I'm looking for so just fyi I'm not trying to breed anything as of this moment. I only have a few puppies that I acquired on my yard right now. I know framed my initial post like i was making a breeding but I'm not. Just thought it'll be nice to hear what others would prefer traits or bloodline. Again, I apologize if the breeding examples I gave wasn't clear or the best examples.Also something I'm still learning to be better at on your forum here.
I agree with you here.
It's a rough crowd PBC!
Really dude, I mean you have CA Jack, Evolution Kennels, Randy Fox, and a whole bunch of other good dogmen AND women on here who actually have shown and bred winners, champions, grand champions, ROM and POR dogs, and done it for decades. I was in the dogs beginning in the 80's, 90's 00's, and am still here hanging by a thread in the 10's, but I am a veritable nobody and don't claim to be. My dogs on the other hand have proven their worth to those who know what's up.
If I were a guy in your shoes today like I was in the 80's, I'd be wearing out the God Damned keyboard or telephone out trying to get dogs from any of these people. I say that because that is what I did, and the dogs I have now are closely related to dogs I had in the 80's, and directly descended from a bitch I acquired in 1990. The good news is there is hope for you! I wasted 10 years or so being a dumbass too, EVEN though I did take that good first step. It is well within the power of anyone on this site to be a top notch dogman in a matter of a couple of few years. The biggest variable is assimilating the information from the opportunity and privilege it is to be in a place where this much good information is shared freely, or for the nominal price of subscription. I have seen guys come around and ask these same questions since I got on the internet in 1996. Most of them didn't even get as far as good answers. You are well past that already, now put them to use.
It's a rough crowd PBC!
Really dude, I mean you have CA Jack, Evolution Kennels, Randy Fox, and a whole bunch of other good dogmen AND women on here who actually have shown and bred winners, champions, grand champions, ROM and POR dogs, and done it for decades. I was in the dogs beginning in the 80's, 90's 00's, and am still here hanging by a thread in the 10's, but I am a veritable nobody and don't claim to be. My dogs on the other hand have proven their worth to those who know what's up.
If I were a guy in your shoes today like I was in the 80's, I'd be wearing out the God Damned keyboard or telephone out trying to get dogs from any of these people. I say that because that is what I did, and the dogs I have now are closely related to dogs I had in the 80's, and directly descended from a bitch I acquired in 1990. The good news is there is hope for you! I wasted 10 years or so being a dumbass too, EVEN though I did take that good first step. It is well within the power of anyone on this site to be a top notch dogman in a matter of a couple of few years. The biggest variable is assimilating the information from the opportunity and privilege it is to be in a place where this much good information is shared freely, or for the nominal price of subscription. I have seen guys come around and ask these same questions since I got on the internet in 1996. Most of them didn't even get as far as good answers. You are well past that already, now put them to use.Thanks for shedding some light for me TFX! I couldn't agree with you more. The fellas on here are very helpful and informational in each and every way. Certainly will take advantage of them!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
