I don't see how my ability to see which pups are going to be better at an early age has anything to do with you.

I was refering to your earlier post. #11 But your right it has nothing to do with me.


Okay, if that is true, then your ability to see which pups are the best does suck.

Here are two concepts you need to grasp:

1) Other people are simply better than you at certain things;
2) You are also better than other people at certain things.

If you can't see what to look for in a pup, athletically, then don't project your inability to see what you need to see in other people. And if you've only bred a few litters, how can you possibly presume to believe you have the same knack for breeding as someone who's bred scores of litters ... AND kept the same family in the winner's circle for decades?


Oh your absolutley right. I'm not even close to a breeder of your standards. And thats why i was impressed with this ability because i never heard of anyone being able to before.
For me it has been the case almost every time. The pups that are turning on early, great structure, movement and attitude are most often the ones getting beaten by the half skittish quiet ones. More than once have i thought of getting rid of pups i didn't believe in only to be proven dead wrong when times come to put em to the test.

You are a self-admitted non-breeder, and if you don't have the aptitude to pick the right pups, then you probably won't make much of one.

That doesn't mean you don't have a lot of skill in other areas that are important. The fact is, most people suck at breeding, which is why they can't keep the same family winning, and are always "starting over" again, and buying dogs.



Spot on again. Thats why all pups are kept with me or my close circle. At the end the best ones will still be available but i can't tell before they have been looked at. I'm also the first to admit i suck at breeding.



Ps. sorry for my crappy quoting skills.