View Poll Results: Should Showing EXTREME GAMENESS qualify a dog for DOY status?

Voters
85. You may not vote on this poll
  • YES: Gameness is the essence of the breed, and dogs who show it to the extreme are deserving.

    47 55.29%
  • NO: The DOY title should only be about performance.

    38 44.71%
Page 6 of 15 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 144

Thread: Should Showing EXTREME GAMENESS be Part of DOY Candidacy?

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by ragedog10 View Post
    I'll go with CH.Lotto he took what most would not and would of been then all night long.
    Was that in 2014?

  2. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by stopem View Post
    I always thought that gameness was the name of the game but if he look at it in this sense then Hallie Berry should've been considered
    Who did she beat/time?

  3. #53
    Extreme Gameness should qualify a dog for DOY status, due to the trickery. One should also add more titles so that the level of honesty is balanced as well. If not a lot of key things will continue to go unnoticed.

  4. #54
    Split dead even at 13/13

  5. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by Pit Bull Committed View Post
    I would also cull one that is game to the bone but lacks mouth, ability, stamina, intelligent, etc.
    Never would I do such a thing. If a dog shows the will to never quit, regardless of what happens to him. He deserves to live in my book. JMO

    GLOBAL

  6. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Pit Bull Committed View Post
    A truly elite dog may never be put in the situation where it had to show heart...so I believe having two separate titles would be best.
    I agree 100%

    GLOBAL

  7. #57
    Quote Originally Posted by MWA View Post
    Never would I do such a thing. If a dog shows the will to never quit, regardless of what happens to him. He deserves to live in my book. JMO

    GLOBAL
    Yeah, this guy Pit Bull Committed needs to be committed.

    He speaks about breeding top quality animals "through culling" ... but I'm not sure if he's ever actually bred a top quality, Champion-defeating animal

    As best as I can tell, hard-culling produces nothing ... only breeding decisions produce dogs.

    No one that I know of, who actually has bred top-quality animals, culls exceptionally-game dogs.

    That is the mark of an idiot/dog-butcher, but not a dogman.

    I do agree that ability is certainly important, of course it's important, but dogmen treasure gameness above all else ... you don't kill exceptionally-game dogs.

    Jack

  8. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by MWA View Post
    I agree 100%

    GLOBAL
    I'm with this also and if gameness comes into account with elite dogs on the grand stage with eachother. We all still will be looking more at the Grand stage.

  9. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by CA Jack View Post
    Was that in 2014?
    Yes it was.

  10. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by ragedog10 View Post
    I'll go with CH.Lotto he took what most would not and would of been then all night long.
    Gets my vote too

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •