Jack
PS: It's like putting in a lightbulb, lol. I mean, how many idiots does it take to put in a lightbulb?
Maybe one guy is holding the ladder, maybe one guy is getting the lightbulb, but ultimately only ONE person is actually screwing the lightbulb in
"What if the guy on the top is only holding the bulb and the other two are turning the ladder?"...... Who becomes the breeder then? Just wondering. EWO
The one who rounded-up the other 2 as "helpers" to get the job done.Originally Posted by EWO
However, all 3 should be shot as morons.
I am still having trouble comprehending what is so hard for people to understand about all this?
The rules here are simple: list the ONE person who truly applies as breeder (rather than try to list 2, 3, 5 names, etc.).
If you feel so strongly about mentioning "how many idiots" it took to get a breeding done, then just say all of that shit in THE NOTES.
THAT IS WHAT "THE NOTES" ARE FOR: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Again, you can give everybody and their brother credit, if you want, just do so in THE NOTES ... DO NOT try to cram all that shit on the Breeder link
ONE BREEDER ONLY on the Breeder link.
THE REST OF THE STORY on The Notes.
What is so difficult to comprehend about this requirement?
Jack
The point has been taken, even before the thread was started. I was looking for others opinions on the matter, no need to be disrespectful because one has a different view.
S_B
All anyone has to do is THINK.
Making a person repeat themselves, over and over and over and over again, is its own form of disrespect.
My reasoning has been stated, as well as WHY: data search purposes.
Yeah, we can all laugh, and try to invent scenarios, but it would make things better (and more efficient) for ALL if everyone JUST COMPLIED
Jack
You want the fame, the glory, the spotlight, you can have it. I don't want my name on it anyway. Only people who needs to know would already know, and those who don't... Well...
You are absolutely right, that is why we discuss things to invoke thought.
No one is forced to repeat themselves.
Yes it has, and I have no problem with complying with your rules as previously stated. I just chose to repeat that.
Again, yes!Yeah, we can all laugh, and try to invent scenarios, but it would make things better (and more efficient) for ALL if everyone JUST COMPLIED
Jack
Jack,
My intention was to get the thoughts of other dogmen, not discredit your decision. I didn't start the thread with "Who's the breeder? Jack's rules suck ya'll speak out against him"And what's funny is you asked me to start the thread!
Maybe it's early and I'm extra irritable, but the idiot and moron comments from EWO and yourself struck a chord. A good dogman was called borderline for many years, he didn't know why. The running joke was he was borderline retarded, which light heartedly is funny because he's reckless and crazy in some ways. But the nickname was more geared toward the fact he wasn't the best at spelling and it was rumored he couldn't read, which is false.
His conditioning is second to none, none of those same folks were lining up to catch his weights. He built his own jenny, and all of his dog equipment and his yard was always tip top.
He can work heavy equipment, build a house pad, lay the foundation and build it to completion from the ground up. All of this was self taught through the years by watching others. None of those snickering dogmen can do what borderline does.
I'm not being overly sensitive, I don't care what folks think or say about me at this point in my life. But it does get old when it happens here especially when you yourself claim to have created a respectable place for dogmen to congregate. It squashes a thread and more than likely prevents a lot of folks from posting all together.
Now I think I'll have a cup of coffee!
S_B
Couldn't agree more, I would much rather leave it all blank but that defeats the whole purpose of coming here does it not?
As an example, you can't say you don't want to know all there is to know about the man behind DBL GR CH TORNADO. All the details to be found out drives us dogmen like it does teenage girls catching a glimpse of their heartthrob! We all get giddy when we hear about the greats. We can easily say we don't want to know, but we do!
S_B
This is asinine. If you feel this way, then don't create any pedigrees here.
If you do create pedigrees here, then please be complete, thorough, and FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS.
This is not 'your' world, it is my world.
It is not all about "you" or even "me"; it is about THE COMMUNITY *AND* FUNCTIONALITY OF THE DATABASE.
If you want to "be in private" then go sit by yourself.
If you want to add pedigrees here, then please follow my rules.
We are making major changes here, we will be condensing a lot, thereby improving absolutely everything, and those people who do not comply will be dropped as the useless appendages they are.
Following the procedures here makes things better for all.
Failing to follow the procedures here makes botches things up for all.
Culling those who botch things up is a NECESSITY ... as it keeps the integrity of the data intact.
I can't "make you" follow my rules, that is up to you.
But I *can* dump your ass out of here if you don't.
The choice is yours. It's that simple.
Jack
I understand that. In case you didn't notice, the original thread was fine.My intention was to get the thoughts of other dogmen, not discredit your decision. I didn't start the thread with "Who's the breeder? Jack's rules suck ya'll speak out against him"
I answered all questions and made my points.
There was nothing further to discuss.
I never called EWO a retard. So you have a reading disability.
Go ahead and provide me with the quote where I called him a retard.
It is helpful in any discussion for a person to actually read and comprehend what was said before they get all riled up.
Thank you for the Testimonial of EWO.
It wasn't needed, as I have always considered EWO to be one of the most valuable contributors here (and have stated this on more than a few occasions).
The "retards" were his mock-3 installers of the lightbulb
I posted the additional message in green to try to get OTHER people NOT to fogging ask me another mf-ing question about this, and to just comply with my rules.
Yes you are being overly-sensitive.
The only thing you have right is that I did try to squash this thread, because I DON'T want to be asked a million different scenarios, because I have already made my point. Now I want my rules followed.
My green-highlighted post was not designed to insult either you, or EWO, but it was absolutely designed to deter anyone from posting another "ya but, what-if" question again ... and make them simply GET IT and follow the rule.
I answered the general question, happily and freely, in a few different scenarios.
But now, I have better things to do with MY time then answer the same fogging thing, a hundred different times, in a hundred different ways.
Thanks for understanding, and go drink some cranberry juice, lol
Jack
Posting Permissions
