He never threatened you , he simply ask you to validate your claims .You came to his site boasting .He is right to , those dogs were to young to be put in a situation as that.I am not putting you down but answer the man's questions ?Originally Posted by Badboy Kennel
1 ,I don't have to answer nothing to you buddy,no he didn't threaten me but I also know his the owner of this site,but you on the other hand is just like me a member.You won't to know anything about the fast lane,then use your references then speak,don't get on her trying to get me to incrimate myself.
Jack needs to stop acting like he's peoples father with the spelling corrections and such. Why don't you make a video territorial of how to eat with a fork and knife correctly. Regardless if some of the questions in this thread where "valid", you're ruining your own board with your constant down talking and forcing your opinion on everyone in every damn thread. Can't even find the decency to respect your own moderators.
Lol, banned, not band
Never said you were stupid, just that the spelling is bad
All forms of boasting about these dogs are forms of self-incrimination.
All forms of "my dog won" are forms of boasting.
I have been doing this for years, safely, because there are ways of boasting so where you don't really give out enough information for anything to happen. There are also ways of boasting where you're saying/showing too much. I am not asking you to say anything that is "too much," am asking you to qualify your boasting.
You are the one who came on here boasting about your dogs ... and, it seems like, for good reason. I would be bragging too
I did not ask you to "incriminate yourself" any more than you have already.
What I asked is, "Why do you give only the bitch credit?", "Were these wins over credible dogmen?", and, "Don't you think you're rushing things by matching a 12 month old?"
If these questions put you into a tailspin, then you're awfully sensitive.
When dogs win, the typical question ANYONE asks is, "Who did they beat?"
This is a question that gets asked from the lowest level to the highest
When we had the thread topics evaluating the Candidates for DOY here ... do you really think it's enough to say, Gr Ch X beat "a dog?"
We want to know WHO they beat to QUALIFY for being DOY, don't we?
I mean, how do you think dog-quality GETS evaluated other than by quality of opposition?
Mind you, I am not "criticizing" your quality of opposition, I honestly don't know, which is why I am seeking clarification.
I asked the same questions of my own customers
If I sold a dog to a guy who "won 2," but his wins were over two nothing dogs owned by nobodies ... and if I sold another dog to another guy, whose dog won 2 (one over HOE and the other over Captain America), which dog of MINE do you think I would be higher on? They both might be littermates; they both might be equally-good; but one simply has a more impressive record than the other.
Why? Quality of Opposition, that's why.
So, again, I am not asking you questions I wouldn't be asking my own customers about my own bloodline.
Why do you think it's the bitch, not the studs, producing these qualities?
Why are you hooking a 12 month old dog?
Are these wins over quality opponents or just nobodies?
There is nothing wrong with these questions, and again, they are questions ANYONE needs answered in order to better-assess what is being claimed here.
Jack
PS: I will bite my tongue on your spelling
People's, not peoples
Tutorial, not territorial
I try to re-read, proof my posts. Sometimes I miss some things, some times I am in a hurry and hit reply. The majority of the words I spell incorrectly are basically from speed and lack of typing ability. Spelling and grammar only bother me when it prevents the idea from being delivered. Most of the time I can get the intention of the post so all is well with me.
My wife on the other hand has the OCD Jack mentions. She corrects texts as well as Face book posts. Her friends are critical of her but she spazzes when the English language is jacked up. So I see this often.
Personally I do not see the need to point it out, but to each his own.
With that said, the questions were legitimate. If I come on here and say my dog did this and that, any and every one on the board has every right ask questions pertaining to the validity of my claims. If I can't take and/or answer the questions than I should keep my dogs and his conquests to myself.
One of my favorite sayings in these dogs is, "People that need to know, know and the people who do not need to know, don't". Making the initial post sort of tosses this out the window.EWO
Nooooo I would never try and get you to tattle on yourself ..my ba d if that's the way it come out.
This has nothing to do with you starting them to early ..I won't back up on that.If I get the boot so be it.
He isn't ruining anything nut ! this guy who started this thread spilled on himself! Ok if you gone pour ya guts out why not be ready to back it up when asked ? you have already incriminated yourself .People's, not peoples
Tutorial, not territorial
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote