Originally Posted by
CA Jack
If you are breeding dogs well, there should be several fine picks in the litter, not just one.
Still, there can sometimes be pups which are exemplary.
Whether they are "game" or not should have been resolved in the breeding decisions made on the way up the genetic tree to where you're at.
The more solid the percentages behind you (meaning the parents + their littermates; grandparents + their littermates, etc.), the less you even have to worry about that.
The bigger holes in the percentages behind you, the more you will have to worry about gameness (and the less reason to even make the breeding in the first place).
If you have a truly high-percentage, quality line you aren't "hoping" they will be game, you're pretty much confident that your pups will be gamer than the common bullshit out there.
What you're tinkering with is the ability on top of the gameness.
Some pups will simply be stronger and better than the others.
For ability, you're pretty much narrowing it down to strength, speed, and intelligence.
The breeder himself has to have a respectable degree of the latter in order to properly assess these traits.
The balance/stance of the pups; how they move; how they play; what they do.
If you are breeding your own family of dogs, and have repeatedly and consistently raised litters off the same line, all bred for the same style/purpose, then YES, you should easily be able to spot those pups who have achieved the "genetic bullseye."
Most of your pups should "hit the target," but there will be one or two who may hit the bullseye (or pretty close to it).
But if you're just randomly breeding dogs together, from different lines, with different traits, and with differing percentages behind them (that mostly can't even hit the target), then you're crap-shooting and not being very focused in your genetic selection.
Jack