Originally Posted by
EWO
Good post.
I agree there are more buyers than breeders but I also think it has been that way all along. Pick any era and there were top breeders and people who bought dogs from top breeders.
It may be a percentage thing as well. It may just as many top breeders as it ever was, just thousands more willing to buy them. That in turn makes the top breeders fewer and farther in between amongst the masses.
I do agree with the analogy about the goose and the golden eggs. I never thought much about it way back. The guy that turned me onto dogs only matched dogs. He bought dogs and had dogs placed with him. He kept 10-12 open to the world year around. When I got in the dogs I guess I just figured the two were separate, breeding/selling and matching. I got in on the matching train.
As far as culling, we culled a lot of dogs that (looking back) should have been bred. If it was a dog that placed and he was a game plug, or a good dog just not match quality, he was sent back. If it were ours and he was not a match quality dog he was culled. When I first got in the dogs curs were not culls, it was understood. Culling was decisions that were made on whether or not the dog could show on Saturday night. In the beginning we never sold anything. (I say we, but it was mostly the guy that turned me on to the dogs, but I was right there with him with my dogs). Dogs either made it to the show or they didn't.
Hind sight being 20/20, we should have done things a lot differently. Looking back I wish we had bred this dog to that dog or took that bitch to that stud, etc. etc. But no need crying over spilled milk.
The upside to not breeding the dogs is that it was all about schooling, feeding and conditioning.
Not all bad..
EWO