Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Although we don't breed for it specifically, how important is the color trait to you?

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by ToTheDogs View Post
    Jack whatever became of that little chocolate green eyed pup off silverback? Forgot his name
    His name was Green Eyes, and he grew up to be a very game dog, but no finisher. His eye color also eventually became gold

    He is a full brother to the last dog I own, Amazon, but he is from the first breeding; she is from the third breeding.

    Jack

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by R2L View Post
    lmao i had 3 black dogs a few months ago, now none of them are left and i actually replaced them with brindles and buckskin

    if i were to breed 2 brindles, and my litter would consist of 5 brindles and 2 bucksin. i keep all pups anyway, but if i was letting anything go it be the buckskin.
    Just shows what u get when colour isnt one of the criteria for breeding. One good thing about all dogs look the same is when u walk dogs neighbours and people u meet think u walk the same dog all the time.

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by ToTheDogs View Post
    I like to have a uniform yard I like a typical yellow lookin hound. That being said if I have a litter I always keep the yellow ones. Victor would do the same and send the red nose hollingsworth dogs to the usa. Here's a question wtf is the deal with chocolate dogs? I know its supposed to be a mutation of black. I have a little buckskin bitch who sire is a chocolate and throws black, chocalate and yellow dogs. So the bitch is coming in and she has two sons a red nose red hound and a black son I'm going to take her to one of them. So which son would produce more cola looking chocolate hounds. Seems like the chocolate ones are better for reasons I have zero fucking clue?
    I wonder that myself, every chocolate dog I've ever seen was a damn good dog and not a cold one. Buddy of mines had a male come out chocolate, and when bred he kept all the chocolate ones but never the black ones. The black ones for the most part were garbage but every chocolate dog off him was show quality and had won a show or lost game trying. Never had 1 cull off about 25+ coco dogs. He hated Coco dogs but said that what was winning so eventually his yard because Coco and buckskin black nose. The buckskin red nose dogs werent great quality either. Also his Coco dogs didnt have mouth but all appeared to have same face style and were fast and would finish, his buckskin red nose dogs all could punch werent as quick but wouldnt even attempt to finish.

  4. #14
    That's crazy now that I think about it the very first pit bull I owned was a chocolate red nose and she was dead game I mean took her shit til the bitter end! I never even really thought about that til now, but anyway.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by skipper View Post
    Just shows what u get when colour isnt one of the criteria for breeding. One good thing about all dogs look the same is when u walk dogs neighbours and people u meet think u walk the same dog all the time.
    Man I live in the city, I usually don't have more than two dogs. Some make and some don't. The problem being your neighbours get suspicious if every 2 years or so you have a new dog. This is one reason I always get dogs that are about the same colour and size. My last three dogs had the exact same name they'd answer to which is the name my neighbours would be told. Now each of those dogs had different call names but even those were real similar. There are people who will tell you I had the exact same dog since 2001 but there's been like 3 or 4 of them.

    Besides I don't care who knows I like red dogs!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •