Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: why so few preservation breedings?

  1. #11

    Re: why so few preservation breedings?

    Quote Originally Posted by R2L
    i have no doubt you know how the preserve your blood hows its supposed to but those pretty "pure" paper breeders seem to annoy me more then pointless outcrosses
    LOL, well, I know what you're saying, but to me pointless = pointless

    Fletcher Chavis selectively outcrossing an inbred Redboy dog (that he won with and knows the traits) to an inbred Jocko bitch (that he won with and knows the traits is lacks) ... to produce multiple winning dogs in a litter ... is an example of a professionally-made outcross.

    Joe Schmoe buying a linebred x animal (without actually knowing a GD thing about a single dog in the ped) and then immediately "crossing it" to a so-so bred y animal (that he likewise knows nothing about) is the kind of rank amateur breeding that 99% of everyone who "buys a dog" tries to do, which is what I personally get sick of seeing.

    Jack


    .

  2. #12

    Re: why so few preservation breedings?

    that's all i do

  3. #13

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •