http://www.apbt.online-pedigrees.com...&dog_id=406269
ch sooner a good dog and produced alot good hunters up this way
http://www.apbt.online-pedigrees.com...&dog_id=406269
ch sooner a good dog and produced alot good hunters up this way
well either way every breeding your gonna go threw dont matter how its bred if your really out performing with it sure keeping a tight family is hard work but its just as hard to cross the lines you like and make a family or a solid foundation from different crosses or surely just as hard there is line breeding as well that can be loose bred but tight on a few specific worthy dogs there is no holy grale to breeding or anything in these dogs its just alot hard work and dedication that will take you ahead the game no matter your methods to madness some methods work for one might not for the other
Keep in mind I never said he didn't believe in breeding tight, but did say he didn't like inbreeding.As many stud dogs as Bert owned in his time thier should be examples of a inbred litter , if he did any.
Do you think that everyone will share every breeding that's done? Study Jack's breeding habits. He is one of the best at breeding, did he inbreed... Carver,Garner,Mayfield,Irish Jerry,Crenshaw,Duckworth,Mims,Hammonds,Bradshaws,M arlowe,Crews,Tant,Hardcore, there's a plethora of great breeders that inbred.
Big easy if you go back and read my post you will not see where I said that I disagree with inbreeding.I have done it myself,as a matter of fact I said to each their own.All I said was Bert didn't believe in it.Floyd B would be the master at inbreeding ,,IMO..And he did a great job with his family of dogs,many,many winners.Again I have no problem with inbreeding.
Hammonds is not someone known for Inbreeding. There were a few inbred litters in the early 80's but that was it. I've known him over 20 years and in that time, there was only one two father to daughter breedings from his stock I know of. Myself and another guy were the ones that did them both. Not GH. He doesn't believe in it.